Using prompt engineering to foster critical thinking in higher education

Ana Mirković Moguš
University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer, Faculty of Education, Cara Hadrijana 10, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
amirkovic@foozos.hr
DOI: 10.46793/eLearning2025.235MM

 

Abstract. This paper presents a systematic review of the latest research (2023 2025) concerning the contribution of prompt design to the development of critical thinking skills in the field of AI-supported eval practices. The review combines studies of empirical and conceptual nature that are examining various prompting strategies, such as role-based, Socratic, scenario-driven, iterative, and chain-of thought approaches. According to the findings, well designed prompts essentially stimulate the higher-order cognitive processes, which are the ones that involve the critical thinking skills of analysis, creation, and reflective reasoning and also that they lead to increased engagement and metacognitive awareness. The results additionally point to the possibility of prompt engineering to fundamentally change the role of AI as a mere informational resource to that of a co-teacher with active engagement in pedagogy, albeit with some issues still existing in the area of teacher preparation, curriculum modification, and AI literacy. In conclusion, prompt engineering is just as much a teaching practice as it is a technical skill and it is at the core of students’ critical and reflective abilities development in modern learning environments.

Keywords:   AI in education, prompt design, metacognition.

References:

[1] Heston, T. F., Khun, C.: Prompt engineering in medical education. International Medical Education, 2, 198–205 (2023). https://doi. org/10.3390/ime2030019

[2] Walter, Y.: Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 21, 1–29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

[3] Tseng, Y. J., Yadav, G.: ActiveAI: Introducing AI literacy for middle school learners with goal-based scenario learning (arXiv:2309.12337) (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.12337

[4] Lee, U., Jung, H., Jeon, Y., Sohn, Y., Hwang, W., Moon, J., Kim, H.: Few-shot is enough: Exploring ChatGPT prompt engineering method for automatic question generation in eng lish education. Education and https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12249-8 Information Technologies (2023).

[5] Vargas-Murillo, A. R., Pari-Bedoya, I. N. M. de la A., & Guevara-Soto, F. de J. Challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impact of ChatGPT usage in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7), 122 – 135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.7

[6] Graefen, B., Fazal, N.: From Chat bots to virtual tutors: An overview of Chat GPT’s role in the education. Arch. https://doi.org/10.51847/touppjedsx Pharm. Pract. 15(2), 43-52 (2024).

[7] Bai, L., Liu, X., Su, J.: ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain‐X, 1(3), 1–9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/brx2.30

[8] Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., Kremantzis, M.: The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865 882, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881

[9] Nufus, R. H., Octoviani, R., Eliyana, S., Sari, I. J.: The Implementation of the Teaching Campus Program on Students’ 21st Century Skills: A Systematic Review, Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 3(2), 278–294 (2023).

[10] Ali, F., Choy, D., Divaharan, S., Tay, H. Y., & Chen, W.: Supporting self-directed learning and self-assessment using TeacherGAIA, a generative AI chatbot application: Learning approaches and prompt engineering. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 135–214 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2258886

[11] Bozkurt, A., Sharma, R. C.: Generative AI and prompt engineering: The art of whispering to let the genie out of the algorithmic world. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), i vii (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174941

[12] Eager, B., Brunton, R.: Prompting higher education towards AI-augmented teaching and learning practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, (2023). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.02

[13] Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., Lameras, P.: Designing educational escape rooms with generative AI: A framework and ChatGPT prompt engineering guide, 17th European Conference on Games Based Learning, 17(1), 180–189 (2023). https:// doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1870

[14] Hutson, J., Cotroneo, P.: Generative AI tools in art education: Exploring prompt engineering and iterative processes for enhanced creativity. Faculty Scholarship. 477 (2023). https:// dig italcommons.lindenwood.edu/faculty-research-papers/ 477

[15] Tupper, M., Hendy, I. W., Shipway, J. R.: Field courses for dummies: can ChatGPT design a higher education field course? EdArXiv Preprints (2023). https://doi.org/10 35542/osf.io/ b65nu

[16] Wang, M., Wang, M., Xu, X., Yang, L., Cai, D., Yin, M.: Unleashing ChatGPT’s power: A case study on optimizing information retrieval in flipped classrooms via prompt engineering. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. (2023) https:// doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023. 3324714

[17] Cain, W.: Prompting change: Exploring prompt engineering in large language model AI and its potential to transform education. TechTrends. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528- 023-00896-0

[18] Hu, L.-K., Lee, D., C.: Prompt Engineering for Critical Thinking and Equity in General Education, American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 122-129 (2024).

[19] Atlas, S.: ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. University of Rhode Island Publications (2023). https://digitalcom mons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548

[20] van den Berg, G., du Plessis, E.: ChatGPT and generative AI: possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13, 1–12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

[21] Lo, L. S.: The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102720 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720

[22] Leung, C. H.: Promoting optimal learning with ChatGPT: A comprehensive exploration of prompt engineering in education. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(2), 104–114 (2024). https://doi.org/10.55493/5052.v8i2.5101

[23] Zhang, L., Lin, J., Kuang, Z., Xu, S., Yeasin, M., & Hu, X.: SPL: A Socratic Playground for Learning Powered by Large https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.13919 Language Mode (2024).

[24] Bushell, C.: Investigating the Integration of AI Chat Models to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills through Engineered Prompting. (2025). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5017061 [25] Fabio, R.A., Plebe, A., Suriano, R.: AI-based chatbot interactions and critical thinking skills: an exploratory study, Curr Psychol 44, 8082–8095 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144 024-06795-8

[26] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., Moher, D.: The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic re views. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21860/med flum2021_264903

[27] Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., Moules, N. J.: Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

[28] Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., Zhou, D.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv: 2201. 11903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903

[29] Xu, B., Yang, A., Lin, J., Wang, Q., Zhou, C., Zhang, Y., Mao, Z.: Expertprompting: In structing large language models to be distinguished experts. arXiv:2305.14688. (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.14688

 

 

Izvor: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on e-Learning (ELEARNING2025)